Tuesday, 30 May 2023

Disney’s The Little Mermaid, Caribbean Slavery, and Telling the Truth to Children


Children’s films should not ignore the more difficult parts of our history, just because adults feel uncomfortable addressing them.


The question is: How do we make films for children of all races that acknowledge the horrors of historical events such as slavery, while making sure they are free to imagine a wonderful world unencumbered by racism and are not defined by it?


On Sunday I watched the new live action version of Disney’s The Little Mermaid with my six-year-old son.


The visual effects are stunning and the casting is brilliant. If you are not aware, and at this point you would literally have to be living under a rock in the middle of the ocean not to be aware, Halle Bailey plays the eponymous heroine in a celebration of normalising Black beauty standards for children.


For my young son to see the most beautiful character in a film as a Black woman (with non-straightened hair) is important to me as a parent and goes against literally centuries of White beauty standards and societal norms. It is anti-racism at work on a deep level.


While the importance of casting the Little Mermaid as a Black woman has been commented on in numerous articles the casting of the other roles is also worth a mention. The casting is beautifully “colour blind” with the prince being White and his mother being Black (he is adopted). At the same time the Little Mermaid’s father is White while her Mermaid sisters are of various different races and ethnicities. Race as a social construct, as we know it, clearly does not exists underwater.

A world in which the very idea of race for the main characters seems to be subverted, consciously ignored, and at the same time Black beauty is celebrated, needs to be applauded.

However there is one jarring massive problem with the film and it is less about its treatment of contemporary racial issues and more about its treatment of historical transatlantic slavery.


The film is set in the Caribbean in the 18th century. It does not specify exactly when, but judging from the ships, clothes and other references it is during a time of African chattel slavery. And yet there is not a single direct reference to slavery and the islanders live in racial harmony. 


In this setting, I do not think we do our children any favours by pretending that slavery didn’t exist. For me Disney’s preference to try and wish the inconvenient truth away says more about the adult creatives than it does about children’s ability to work through it.


The enslavement of Africans in the Americas (across the southern states of the US, Caribbean and South America) in the 18th century was a brutal time and has been described by some historians and commentators as a “holocaust”, a crime against humanity that is so heinous that there are calls to this day for reparations to compensate the descendants of the victims.


Setting the fantastical story in this time and place is literally the equivalent of setting a love story between Jew and Gentile in 1940 Germany and ignoring the Jewish holocaust. Or possibly more accurately setting it in a slave plantation in America’s antebellum south and pretending the enslaved Africans were happy.


The 18th century Caribbean is a problematic time to set any children’s story, but that should make it full of creative possibilities as opposed to encouraging historical amnesia.


First of all, I do not need every story and movie that my 6-year-old consumes to be historically accurate. The appearance of steel pans in the film, an instrument invented in the late 1930s, raised a wry smile in the pedant in me, but I found it easy enough to overlook. But the total erasure and rewriting of one of the most painful and important parts of African diasporic history, is borderline dangerous, especially when it is consumed unquestioningly by children. I do not want my child to think that the Caribbean in the 18th century was a time of racial harmony, any more than I suspect a Jewish father wants his child to think 1940 Germany was a time of religious tolerance, however much we might both wish they were. 


So does this mean Black children cannot have escapist fantasies of the past, or all our historical stories have to overtly address racism and slavery? 


Definitely not.


I want my Black son to be as free, joyful and unencumbered by horrors of history just as much as any of his White and Asian friends at school, but I also do not want him, (or any children) to be given a false view of history on key issues - slavery being one of them.


There are several ways in which Disney could have easily set The Little Mermaid story in the Caribbean in the 18th century and not whitewashed (excuse the pun) the importance of history.


For example they could have set the story in Haiti post-1804. Haiti was the first Caribbean country to throw off the shackles of slavery and most importantly in its constitution of 1805 explicitly denounces the idea of different “races” proclaiming true equality. According to Julia Gaffield, a professor of history at Georgia State University, the constitution even “explicitly acknowledged that some ‘white women,’ Germans, and Poles had been naturalized as Haitian citizens highlighting the radical reconceptualization of race that underpinned Haiti’s entry on the world stage.”


In this scenario the Little Mermaid could have easily found her prince, while race and slavery could have been gently touched upon without being overbearing or having to show the horrors. A post revolutionary Haiti would have been the perfect setting for an island of racial harmony, and in doing so it would have gently educated children about an important period in world history.


When we think creatively and know our Caribbean history there are numerous solutions to setting the story in the Caribbean during the time of slavery while neither wanting to erase our history or expose children to the full horrors of chattel slavery. As someone of Jamaican heritage I would have loved the Little Mermaid to fall in love with a Maroon (a runaway slave), although that would have required her to swim a little upstream towards the island's interior.


We owe it to our children to give them the most amazing fantastical stories possible to help their imaginations grow. We do not do this by “whitewashing” out the difficult parts of our history. We do it by embracing our rich history and empowering them with the truth. Next time I hope Disney can be as adventurous with its story telling as it was with its casting.


119 comments:

  1. Virginia Crompton31 May 2023 at 01:23

    Thoughtful and interesting perspective which I whole heartedly share. But putting that aside, thank you for opening this discussion for a range of views to be explored

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all, thank you for reading the piece. Really glad you thought it was helpful in opening up discussion.

      Delete
    2. You're a fucking retard with a worthless degree

      Delete
    3. Ignore any rude, hateful trolls who have nothing better to do than to attempt to spread their misery simply because they lack the success, elegance and intelligence of decent human beings

      Delete
    4. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
    5. Since it’s the Caribbean, would This include Jamaica, where KAMALA HARRIS’S Ancestors were one of the BIGGEST Slave holders there?

      How do you square “reparations” with & for her? How about for Obama? Does he pay himself & break even since he’s half African-American & half White? Unless his Ancestors captured & sold Africans into Slavery when living there? Isn’t Africa where Slavery began? It STILL Exists There to this very day.

      .

      Delete
    6. Do we need to be reminded at every turn, every moment that some of our ancestors were slaves? Take the time to fully educate your own children,

      Delete
  2. The movie was not set in our universe. According to the official tie in materials from Disney, the movie was set in a world where the ocean names are Piton, Carinea, Chaine, Saithe, Brinedive, Fracus, Apneic. Those names are not found in our world. Please do not spread misnformation as if the movie was set in our world, when in fact it was set in different world with their own history. You can read more on The Little Mermaid: Guide to Merfolk by Eric Geron. It's official material from Disney

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Learn to read. He made it clear that it's fictitious

      Delete
    2. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
    3. This article's point is stupid in every way but can we IP ban the anonymous above so it cant spam the same comment everywhere? Seek psychological help instead of posting comments expressing your weird white rage

      Delete
  3. It’s a Disney movie set in an imaginary world and universe. It’s has talking crabs, mermaids, king Triton… it’s not real. Yes, it had mentioned Brazil, but obviously they’re not talking about the Brazil we know; They’re talking about a Brazil in their world. There’s no need to mention chattel slavery. And then according to your logic of historical awareness, The Queen (Prince Eric’s mom) shouldn’t be black, Ariel shouldn’t be black because Prince Eric, who is white falls in love with her, none of the commoners should be black because they should be slaves?? It’s literally a Disney movie for kids to bring joy. Why do you want to subject black children to trauma when all they wanted to see was a mermaid falling in love with a human?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you!!! I AGREE 1000%.. Just can't make these ppl happy. Sad...

      Delete
    2. And some children are made to believe in Santa Claus and flying reindeers.

      Delete
    3. Why do y'all keep harping that it's fictional as though he didn't mention that he fully understands that? Comprehension is key here.

      Delete
    4. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  4. Interesting article and it’s annoying that people are so reactionary to the thesis and refuse to actually read your input. Casting black people in white roles does not mean we get to ignore important historical context in our films, yet their are tasteful ways to go about it as you clearly demonstrated here. Thank you! -Black lesbian

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mama this is literally a fiction movie……

      Delete
    2. THIS!!!! All of THIS!!!
      The little mermaid is not real, neither is atlantica...

      You want the truth, pen a documentary or a book. Not a Disney film.

      Delete
    3. Your So wrong < I remember the day in school when Learned of Slavery and I never looked at a Black Person the same again. So YOUR NUTS that you think this .

      Delete
    4. Exactly. Like he stated if some people could read is that this would've been a non-issue if they had simply set the movie in Haiti. Or imo, if they had simply not race swapped the thing at all

      Delete
    5. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
    6. I'm sorry but what? This is a light-hearted Disney movie for children. Why not "gently" address rape while we are at it? There is no "gentle " way to address horrific history or current events like these. This is asinine. A children's fictional movie about being true to yourself and love is not the time and place for really hard hitting topics. I get that this "advocate" observed the fictional world, but the "logic" displayed after was just ridiculous propaganda to make people believe that we are not allowed to create fictional works of art for children without addressing every calamity in this world past our present. Why can't children be children? This was a beautiful world created without some of the harsh realities of our real world. And FYI, making it seem like two worlds are forbidden to mingle and that the land world ppl think merpeople should be killed IS a metaphor for the division of races; THAT is what a "gentle" nod looks like for little ones that are likely THREE AND FOUR years old, ffs.

      Delete
  5. The setting of the film is never named, nor is the time period. The film features an octupus that takes a fish's voice and gives her legs to walk around on Earth. A crab is her chaperone. I feel like this film is not meant in any way to depict anything in our reality.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I appreciate the writing but there are two core points I think you’re overlooking. Granted I am watching the film this evening so maybe my stance will change, but 1- you’ve said that the Prince is white with a black adopted mum, to me, that instantly signals that we’re not in a world that has been overshadowed by slavery, rather a racial utopia with truly integrated families. Personally, whilst I appreciate your suggestion, as a black person too, I would find an over-glamorisation of the transition Caribbean countries experienced post-abolition more harmful. The reality is, these countries continue to suffer today from slavery- in my opinion better to have an alternative reality, than misrepresent our current one. 2- the realities of our society at present- Halle is already getting sooo much backlash for just being in the role, despite clearly being over-qualified from a talent perspective. I think we have to be very careful for the changes we ask for, when we will not be the target of the vitriol. Particularly when we’re asking this of black women, who are frequently the target. There is only so much we can ask Halle as a human being to take on, for the sake of a “more accurate” storyline

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's disappointing to see people being reactionary and not reading a different perspective on favor of glamorizing amd valorizing Disney/Disney-owned imaginations of us, refusing to dive into its limitations.
    If anything, the concept of taking a Dutch-inspired prince and pairing him with a Caribbean-inspired mermaid without much thought of what the actual Dutch did to our people is... very indicative of the narrow scope of stories allowed under the Walt Disney umbrella. Folks are fine with buying into a fantasy of marrying into European monarchies and taking seats next to people who very much reflect those who looted Africa, but stories of Afro-descendant-inspired characters falling in love and experiencing human joys and turmoils and accomplishments similar to our own real-life counterparts is simply not even out up for discussion on the silver screens of these white-owned corporations named after dead fascist white supremacists. Even when we do get a little taste of such stories based off of real Afro-descendant stories, our own people would rather turn their nose up and look towards Walt Disney to "represent" them via their white perspectives and propagandistic portrayals.
    I still haven't forgotten how people treated "The Woman King" versus the new installment of "Black Panther" (a white-created character & country that steals the name from real-life Black revolutionaries, in favor of selling a fictional status quo politically-limited royalty fantasy). This treatment of TLM just seems to follow the same patterns, folks would rather give white Disney money to reward defanged Euro-centric fantasy than reward stories and/or fantasies inspired by real-life Black history. Many people simply want a seat at the master's table instead of helping build up their own people's table that's being left to break down outside.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Respectfully, we don't need to read this reactionary fit to understand why he's wrong. The source material speaks for itself as a country set in a fictional universe amd world where the oceans are named differently, sentient animals talk and creatures that are mythical to us are actually commonplace and part of their animal kingdom. This is also a fictional universe where a Black woman is queen and can adopt a white son. This essay and the promoting Tweet were both a waste of valuable mind capital, time and bandwidth.

      Delete
    2. I remember watching the fictional adventure movie Congo and feeling that what that movie really lacked was an important educational lesson about how Congo is the rape capital of the planet. I mean, sure, it would have been a bit weird and depressing to have that in something that's supposed to be lighthearted fun but since we're bashing a kids movie for not having a sober and serious history lesson in the middle of a story about a mermaid, then we should go after all popcorn movies on the same basis. Aladdin failed to tackle the problem of child marriage, honor killings and female genital mutilation in the middle east for example.

      Delete
    3. Actually, I agree. I will never watch Congo again and I'm burning my copy and Blu-ray in protest.

      #CongoIsFake

      Delete
    4. Exactly what I and many others have been saying. Blackwashing an originally established white character is as irritating as whitewashing has been and still is. We have our own characters and stories, we don't need the white man to throw us a bone by giving us theirs. Halle Bailey could've and should've been her own princess with her own story for little black and brown girls to look up to and admire for years to come, but nope. The sheeple just clap their hands and bow their heads when massa tosses them scraps and openly attacks anyone bold enough to point out the truth. I'm not happy or in support of them blackwashing Ariel because I know they didn't at all do it for inclusion or diversity. They did it so that the money would stay in their pockets while keeping the weak minded of us appeased with a sad attempt at a handout

      Delete
    5. The reason people are being reactionary is that we can't seem to make them happy no mater what anyone does. Make it inclusionary and change the main character to Afro-American, even though logic dictates that the characters lives deep in the ocean where sun rays so not penetrate therefore would be fair skin as in nature, and now are complaining they want to erase slavery because that wasn't included also. However, if they did include it, it would have gotten cancel FOR depicting slavery like Song of the South. That is what is making everyone brain explode.

      I am sure the writer of this article was also on team, change splash mountain because it from a movie that was in the time of slavery (when it actually wasn't, it was after and they were sharecroppers, but that is a different conversation).

      If they had added a slavery scene in this to match her new race at the time, for accuracy, she would have wanted the movie canceled like Song of the South.

      But again, we are talking about a fictional character who changes from a mermaid to a human and she wants it historically accurate? Can you tell me specifically when in history mermaids lived in the ocean, you know, for accuracy.

      Delete
    6. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  8. Nigga this a fictional flim that came out in 1989- if the original story didn't have slavery why tf would a live action have it- you acting like the damn skin color gonna change the whole plot of a boring ass story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The original didn't have black people in it and really? When are we going to get rid of the commonplace use of the N-word? You're extremely ignorant for using it in any context

      Delete
  9. Are you stupid? What the fuck is this bullshit?

    ReplyDelete
  10. So, I'm going to link you to this Tiktok that underlines your point better:

    https://www.tiktok.com/@zappithustra/video/7142865443638758662?lang=en

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  11. "In this scenario the Little Mermaid could have easily found her prince, while race and slavery could have been gently touched upon without being overbearing or having to show the horrors."

    I'm glad you've acknowledged that this universe is a fictional one. But let's pretend that chattel slavery did exist in this world where the island sits. This island appears to be uninvolved in the slave trade because none of the cargo on the two shipwrecks mentioned were human. Also, Prince Eric is overheard telling the senior butler or advisor or whoever that the island needs to expand and make contact with other cultures. This suggests that maybe they are isolated because of an anti-slavery stance? Last, be careful what you ask for in terms of showing kids historical context in films made for them. Remember that Ursala took Ariel's voice, added a secret clause to the contract to impose amnesia of purpose, and thwarted Ariel in her efforts. The price of her inevitable failure is that she would "belong" to Ursula. After all this, Ariel was dragged away in bondage. There is your allusion to Caribbean slavery. And here is the problem with your essay: you got what you wanted, but a Black woman paid the price for it. That's what always happens whenever men set an agenda.

    In future, please use you platform and clout for better things and let children dream for a couple of hours on a weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  12. So what you're saying is you deliberately ignored that this is a piece of feel good escapist entertainment for kids and not intended as a serious history lesson but you couldn't pass up the opportunity to get some attention for yourself with cheap race baiting attacks.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Please stop. I am not sure why everyone is over-thinking and over-analyzing the movie. There is already enough criticism in the U.S. and world because Ariel is not a white woman AND now the make believe movie isn't black enough. Can we accept the small win and give Halle and team the recognition they deserve and stop with all the "this is missing." What a joke. Go somewhere with all that and YES - I am 100% black. Go see the movie - enjoy it, and leave it alone. That's all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm a non-binary queer and I want to say that this piece is absurd. If anything we should be angry that they didn't include more QUEER CHARACTERS.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lol. It's a children's movie.
    How freaking miserable and pathetic do u have to be to be cry about this subject in a freaking children's movie remake of a cartoon? My gosh. Ur poor family must just be filled with anger and hate if all u see at a kids movie is things to bitch about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems like you're the one crying over one opinion you disagree with

      Delete
  16. The woke Left saw the religious Right try to destroy all fun and enjoyment in life and decided they needed to get in on that too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This x trillion. Both sides are as bad as each other. The right are homophobic misogynist racists. The left want everything to be ultra diverse, inclusive and politically correct or they bash it. They've just gone after the makeup artist on The Little Mermaid for not being gay! They lack any self awareness about how they've become just as fascistic as the right. He's a professional award winning makeup artist. What on earth does his sexuality have to do with anything?

      Delete
    2. Thank you….this is the most accurate statement ever. They are competing with each other over who can own what is allowed in our culture. Both crazy zealots

      Delete
  17. Yawn. There is a reason why these modern audience films suck, and it is because of people like you that just have to always find offense in everything. It is never enough.
    Disney is children's entertainment so they are not gonna touch the tired old subject of slavery.
    Tell me, what would have happened if they touched this subject?
    You would have whined on your blog about how this movie should not have done so or how inaccurate the slaves were depicted or something.
    Again, this is Disney. Are you expecting Game of Thrones type of depiction of slavery?
    Will say this, thanks to this movie my son learned to ignore women and you can play Fortnite in the theater while little sis watches this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This really was an excellent opportunity missed - slavery, wars, canabilism - all practiced by various Caribbean people pre-Columbus. I think a song describing the tasty Arawak peoples (literally) would be illuminating - non straitened hair and all

    ReplyDelete
  19. If you're expecting a history lesson from a *disney* movie about mermaids and singing crabs, then it's really you who has the problem. This is the dumbest blog post ive ever read.

    ReplyDelete
  20. How much do you know about the history of Haiti? It wasn't quite racial harmony like you describe. The Haitian Declaration of Independence written in 1804 calls for nothing less but the extermination of the white French, and then it's president, Jean Jacques Dessalines carried out such genocide in his first years as president. After which, it's hard to describe Haiti as racial harmony, but a country of freed black African slaves and a very small minority of white foreigners. Are you really suggesting that this would be a solid history to place into a children's movie? That somehow this is the compromise to excluding slavery? I get it, a movie set in the Caribbean during the 18th century could easily make references to slavery, but can't we just watch a kid's movie with our kids without needing to prepare a deep conversation about the constant horror of humanity? Can't we just use a Disney movie as a fun escape from the real world which gets more ridiculous day by day?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was a little more harsh then you concerning the Harmony during the Haitian revolution it was a total shit show with the extermination of almost all white and mulatto,this guy was given a tittle,I'm sure he couldn't have earned one

      Delete
  21. Marcus, why do you think children need the woes of the ways of mankind Included in a FICTIONAL FANTASY. If we must include real atrocities in children's fantasy entertainment than we must also include that EVERY SINGLE CULTURE IN HUMAN HISTORY HAS HAD SLAVES. Including black cultures. So Marcus. If you want to tell a story about history tell the complete story, not just the part that fits your policy agenda. If you want the truth tell the entire truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  22. Taking your child to a frolicking fantasy movie with no basis in reality except for geographic location and then being upset that during your child's good time she wasn't exposed to mankind's atrocities. Your sick and wanting to ruin something fun for your child with brutality is mental abuse.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Top 500 entertainment Influencers in 2022 by Variety. That explains why corporate entertainment sucks if you're one of entertainments best. I'm surprised my Scottish kin put up with you.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No. A children's fantasy feel good film with mermaids and singing crabs is not the place to have a moment about slavery.

    If you have a fetish for the suffering of black people, just say that. This whole piece feels terrible disingenuous, and I'm sorry for your kid.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Go ahead and write your "black suffering" fanfi of the little mermaid, don't pretend you are doing it for education.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Do you work for the MSM? I mean wtf, you have to be some kind of special idiot to write this long blog post about nothing. Movies don't need to historically accurate because you think so, they need to be entertaining. I am so sick of the race card being played. And trying to play it off as historically accuracy for a children's movie is the definition of pathetic, just so you know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  27. Accept it as a social commentary saying that if mermaids and talking crabs had existed, there would have been no slavery.

    Prove them wrong, if you can.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Absolutely brain dead take. No reason to change the contents of a fantasy story (about a fictional mermaid who does not exist) just because a black woman happens to be the lead actress. I don't understand why kids can't have their moment of joy instead of constantly being reminded of slavery. This is a Disney film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  29. When I saw the film, my instinct was similar to yours. I saw the Caribbean context to be a way for Disney to safely (and passively) explain away their intent of casting Bailey to be Ariel. She was wonderful and endearing for every second of that film, as well as a great role model for all young girls. But the celebration of black Caribbean culture reminded me of Song of the South. That film is also endearing, fun, fantastical, with great casting that was also groundbreaking for its time (James Baskett), but to see plantation workers joyfully singing and dancing painted a picture that distorts the painful history that's there.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I guess some people have nothing better to do than to look for something to be offended at.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      .

      Delete
  31. So, because they casted a black actor in the role of Ariel, we must now fetishize the suffering of both african and indigenous Carribeans brought down upon us by imperialists? Children should only know themselves of what came after the pain their ancestors endured?

    Get a history book, dude, let folk of color have escapism once and a while. No one was saying this when Ariel was white.

    ReplyDelete
  32. It’s a Disney movie you absolute clown. Actually there is white an easy solution for the imaginary problem you’re so determined to find everywhere you look, and that would be to stop race swapping red headed characters out of existence. An actual problem in Hollyweird.

    ReplyDelete
  33. You’ve got to be absolutely joking. I can’t believe you thought it was a good idea to write this and then go a step further and press publish. Since when does slavery need to be interwoven into a PRINCESS movie? And if Ariel was white I’m guessing you’d want to see slaves in chains in the background then according to your logic? Is disney the correct avenue to correctly talk about slavery? when is too young to learn about the brutalities of slavery? As a black person, there is a time and place for everything and why you believe that slavery should be brought to Disney channel of all places is beyond me. I don't even want to hear your thoughts on Princess Tiana. No we dont want to turn on a literal FANTASY movie and be reminded of those brutalities. Lets not downplay the role of Black JOY.

    ReplyDelete
  34. It's not too late to delete this garbage.

    Also I laughed out loud at you trying to say that this movie is not realistic because they didn't put Ariel in chains - but it would have been more realistic if it portrayed post-revolutionary Haiti as a utopia of racial unity.

    Post-revolutionary Haiti where white colonizers were slaughtered wholesale, black people were fighting among themselves, the economy was in freefall because plantations were in shambles, like nothing was organized. Nothing!
    And you really seriously want us to believe that a black mermaid-human and a white prince would have been just like...super cool in that environment. Hunky dory, part of your world, no problems.
    Please. Okay.
    Please!
    Just say that you don't like to see black people enjoying things, and we were having too much fun.
    Just say that. Don't insult our intelligence in the bargain.
    The clownery, the buffoonery.
    Someone needs to take your internet away, you're not using it properly LOL!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ariel in CHAINS!??

      DON’T Be RIDICULOUS!

      ANYONE Who Knows HISTORY and FACTS KNOWS Ariel was a “ “HOUSE Negro”!!

      Delete
    2. 😂😂😂

      Delete
  35. I’m just here to watch people drag you in the comments for this ridiculous article 🤣

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally agree - reading the responses is entertaining, but more importantly, it gives me hope that most people are capable of living their lives in proper context.

      Delete
  36. The problem with your article is you are stuck in the algorithm just like reactionaries on the right. It wasn't enough for Disney to cast a black person. They must feed your twisted sense of diversity truth on children? Who in their right mind would suggest discussing the horrors of slavery with a movie that has a target audience of 6 year olds? Maybe you did this with your kids, but no most people don't want that, and Disney knows that. Honestly you need to step out of the world you inhabit and start talking to people who don't inhabit the space you do, because frankly this is bizarre. No we didn't misunderstand you, it's you who misunderstand the proper use of diversity, because you have made it into a career. Profit can blind us all to reality. I suggest you use this moment for self-reflection. Learn how to use diversity as a feather, not a hammer.

    ReplyDelete
  37. You're nothing but a race grifter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.
      .

      Delete
    2. You know What??

      Now that he MENTIONS It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa in that film.

      It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

      Delete
  38. Dude you’re an idiot….this isn’t the little mermaid is black learning the history of planet earth and growing up in reality. It’s a fantasy film with a fantasy kingdom with a fantasy “world” retreat from your woke state

    ReplyDelete
  39. Absolutely moronic take.

    ReplyDelete
  40. If you want to tell your child the truth, you should start with the fact that both animated film and original fairy tale this movie is based on have little to nothing to do with black people

    ReplyDelete
  41. Last time I checked this is a movie filled with mythical sea creatures. It doesn’t erase any history nor does it claim to tell a story with historical accuracy. The only thing erasing the history of slavery would be our current educational system or lack of.

    ReplyDelete
  42. So there isn’t an accurate depiction of real life politics but you don’t have an issue with a woman with a fish tail.

    Dude. You’re insane. Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Oh my God, it's a make believe world you idiot. What, a world in which there is magical talking fish also must depict non-fiction atrocities? For what? So that YOU can remind your child that even in a fantasy they must think of themselves as the product of slavery. Can't you let them escape reality for a bit, to be a kid. It is sad that you want to push this burden of knowledge on your child through every facet of their lives. Do you also remind them of the sweatshops that made their clothes and electronics? Or the conditions of illegal immigrants getting food from fields? Or the 1% squirming out of paying taxes and pushing the burden on the low and middle class to shoulder it all. There is a time and place to learn such things, but stop trying to share your burden with a child.

    ReplyDelete
  44. The thought that society needs to address slavery in every single area of social life needs to be addressed. Yes, slavery happened, but slavery has appeared in virtually all ethnicities & cultures. Perhaps we should focus more on making our kids feel a moment of joy without the weight of social Justice? Let’s face it, if your not already rich, your childhood is the only taste of freedom you will ever have. Children do not naturally make a distinction between race. The idea that their should be a distinction between races is an idea that has to be introduced to them & if stop for a moment and take a look around, you’ll notice that most of the violence we see in society (mass shootings, police brutality, cancel culture) isn’t about acceptance, it’s about personal grievance & revenge.

    ReplyDelete
  45. When I read articles like this it makes me wonder whether we have run out of things to complain about...

    ReplyDelete
  46. Now be as adamant about your point to your British Government!

    ReplyDelete
  47. i heard the outrage and had to come read it myself, the quotes are definitely out there but from reading your blog I feel like you were hoping for more of a completely original retelling of the classic “little mermaid” which is cool - but it seems like a bit of an unnecessary criticism for a movie that has already done strides to update a fresh Caribbean Mermaid princess into their ensemble. Personally I believe we would better off pushing this movie to as wide an audience as possible so as to force Disney into making cartoon and toy adaptations of that lovely Caribbean Mermaid rather than pointing out how it could’ve pushed the envelope just a bit more.

    ReplyDelete
  48. You were close when you referenced, "the pedant in me." In truth, the pedant is indistinguishably you.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Curious, does this mean you think they should NOT have changed the theme of Splash Mountain? It's the same thing...

    ReplyDelete
  50. You’re Kidding me, RIGHT?

    Would This include Jamaica, where KAMALA HARRIS’S Ancestors were one of the BIGGEST Slave holders there?

    How do you square “reparations” with & for her? How about for Obama? Does he pay himself & break even since he’s half African-American & half White? Unless his Ancestors captured & sold Africans into Slavery when living there? Isn’t Africa where Slavery began? It STILL Exists There today.

    ReplyDelete
  51. You know What??

    Now that you MENTION It, Disney’s “Alladin” didn’t address the Rape, Torture, Murder, and SLAVERY of “WHITE” people by Arab & Black people in the Middle East & Africa.
    It’s a CRUEL World afterall.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  52. The first synagogue in the US was built in the slave trading port of Newport, RI . Although not official holidays , Jewish High Days and Holy Days caused the slave market to close due to lack of attending traders..

    ReplyDelete
  53. The question is: How do we make films for children of all races that acknowledge the horrors of historical events such as slavery, while making sure they are free to imagine a wonderful world unencumbered by racism and are not defined by it?

    The answer is: You don't, man. Disney films and their stories are not forums to educate children on the horrors and the crimes of the world of men. They're a respite from them. You missed the opportunity to educate because that's what you were doing, taking respite. Good on you for taking the time afterward to resolve the inequities you feel were brought on by the films.

    The world's a terrible place, believe me, I'm as color blind, as color blind gets. We all bleed red. But, actively living with bias on your mind all the time, no matter what color your skin is, is completely unhealthy; whether it be a white skinhead police officer mad at the world because the black man was the first to get picked on the schoolyard basketball court, or a dude mad at a Disney film for not educating children about racial horrors that happened hundreds of years ago.

    But hey, at least you made the news.

    ReplyDelete
  54. What an Idiotic point of view... thats all i am going to say as everyone else has shared exaclty why this is so idiotic. And the funny thing is, all these news articles giving this blog the time of day. Smh

    ReplyDelete
  55. This is a fictional film,set in a fictional world where slavery probably didn't exist.you should probably man up and teach your own child about these things rather than rely on childrens media Todo it for you.

    ReplyDelete
  56. You have got to be fucking kidding me!? After seeing all the triggered white guys mad that she's black you just had to go give them a valid reason to be butthurt. God damn this is the most retarded take on a fucking kids movie I've ever seen in my goddamned life. Jesus Christ, you diversity goal people are insufferable! ITS NOT A HISTORICAL FICTION YOU FUCKING IDIOT. You should shove your obviously worthless degree and diversity programs up your ass where they belong.

    -a black lady who is sick of being assigned victimhood

    ReplyDelete
  57. I don’t think the world is ready for a historically accurate Disney. And THAT is a conversation worth having!

    I say this with a VERY heavy heart but I think it would have minimized Halle’s stellar performance because the media narrative would have just made her out to be a pawn in Disney’s “woke agenda”. And that’s what we need to address.

    We need to address the way that conservative and right wing media have taken the word “woke” and has misconstrued and misrepresented all of the hard work and progress we are all trying to make to be more politically, socially and historically aware of the differences between our cultures, the systemic racism that persists, and navigating a path forward where we are not Colorblind or ignorant to the history that brought us to the present day.

    And I’m so glad that we both shared that feeling watching this film asking ourselves “okay, but where are we at in history and why are we still pretending this didn’t happen” because we can CONTINUE that conversation with each other, with our children.

    I write this from my French Quarter courtyard in New Orleans, surrounded by the former slave quarters. I guarantee you not one tourist who walks by realizes that this architecture, while beautiful, was designed solely to contain the humans they were trafficking. The tourism industry only very recently started putting up plaques and acknowledging the past.

    But I watched that movie twice with a packed audience of Black families and can I just say, the way those little girls and their mom’s and even the boys just had a pep in their step and a smile on their face and this “if she can do that I can do ANYTHING” kind of attitude walking out of those theaters, then I am genuinely excited to be around for this part of history.

    And if we can openly talk about Slavery and history and Human Rights and continue the conversation about how we heal and atone from that Holocaust together as a country and walk together as a United Peoples, THAT is a world I want to be a part of. One that would make Ariel proud to walk in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Princess remake I’m REALLY excited for is the Princess and the Frog. Because Tatiana is the Princess to tell that story. It is HER story to tell the world. If Halle as Ariel can soften the blow, Disney audiences can accept a strong Black woman, a daughter of hardworking parents, who grew up picking strawberries on her family farm, becomes a prominent female chef in a man’s culinary world to become a James Beard winner and leader of her community, leaving behind a proud legacy of elevating soul food to the level of haute cuisine with her family continuing that legacy to this day. I’m speaking of non other than Queen Leah Chase of course. THAT is the live action Disney remake that I wanna see them get right.

      Delete
    2. You do know that Black women are tired of being seen as strong right? We want the prince. We want to fall in love. We want an easy life as Black women

      Delete
    3. You do know that black woman are tired of being seen as strong right? We want to fall in love with a prince.

      Delete
  58. It's a fantasy. Set in a fictional setting. About fictional creatures doing fictional things. Why should it teach the history of slavery? If you want your child educated on slavery, a fantasy about mermaids, with talking seagulls and crabs and a sea witch that can magically take a voice and give a mermaid legs was not the movie to take your child too.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Why can't black kids just be happy and have an escape. Do we have to remind them that they were slaves all the time? The history books already reminds them of it and real life reminds them.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Why do people want black people to be so depressed all the time
    Slavery was not at all empowering to us.

    ReplyDelete
  61. If people can gain power from fascists by performing "anti-racism", then people - some of them - will perform "anti-racism".

    ReplyDelete
  62. Dude just shut the fuck up you seriously have nothing to do with your life for you to write about the movie, it’s a Fucken mermaid movie it’s has nothing to do with slavery, pussies like you gotta get a life

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. if ur this worked up over a stupid article online by some random nobody you need to get offline

      Delete
  63. As a Black American, not every movie needs to deal with racism and slavery. It's a fantasy. Why can't Black children just have some joy? There will be plenty of opportunities to educate them through other means. I don't want every movie I watch to deal with only the negative aspects of our past. There are mermaids, and you're worried about slavery--do we really need to deal with that when there are talking fish? This is why movies with Black leads become labeled as "Black movies/slave movies/trauma porn". We deserve Black joy.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Except this isn't a historical film. It's a fantasy. It's about fantastical creatures, with magic, and it takes place in a fantasy kingdom, in a fantasy setting.
    You should perhaps watch the 1997 Cinderella, starring Brandy, which also has a color blind cast and also include fantasy creatures, with magic, in a fantasy kingdom, in a fantasy setting.
    I say this as an academic and scholar who works intimately with African-American literature and history, the Transatlantic slave trade, and specifically the erasure and manipulation of that history by white western countries: this film is a fantasy that does not need to address anything in our reality. It is a fairy story. Let people, and let children, have their fantasies. There is no harm, and this does not erase anything.

    ReplyDelete
  65. You couldn’t be more wrong about this. I mean, did your child ask you about slavery and why it wasn’t in the film? I’m gonna guess no. Idk why adults have to go and ruin childhoods for. I wish I could be a child again and be gleefully ignorant of the worst things about the world and life. There’s no need to expose young kids not young adults, to unnecessary things. There’s a reason why certain topics are taught at certain ages. I suppose, according to your line of thinking, slavery should be taught beginning what? First grade? Gtfo with your shit blog post. Let kids be blissfully ignorant for as long as they can

    ReplyDelete
  66. Talking/singing animals.
    God like beings.
    Magic.
    Mythical creatures.

    I'm pretty sure this doesn't take place in our version of the real world, so what gives you the right to force slavery into a version of reality that doesn't belong to you. Remember, you're just a guest there, you don't get to make the rules.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Nobody want too see no damn slavery in every film . Please

    ReplyDelete
  68. We need to destroy the diversity industry that gives creeps like you a platform to lecture people with this kind of bullshit, not to mention a fat income that you'd never get if you were white.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Don’t worry bro, with the lackluster numbers this minstrel show abortion is putting up for Disney—not to mention the smug, ungrateful carping from woke grifters like you—you probably won’t have to worry about them ever trying to put any more black actors in anything ever. Personally I’m looking forward to Tom Hanks’ turn as Uncle Remus in the Song of the South remake. Thanks for playing.

    ReplyDelete
  70. If slavery and its erasure is so important, why are there no blog posts about its erasure in Mulan and especially Aladdin? Based on the latters look, that was definitely based on a time period when the arab world was deep into slavery and most of its slaves were from subsaharan Africa, but somehow in that movie you can have arabs and black people be harmonious in one big movie. Really strange.

    ReplyDelete
  71. This is quite possibly the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Nothing else need be said.

    ReplyDelete