Many years ago, as a series producer working in BBC documentaries, I
once recommended a young Assistant Producer to a fellow series producer who was
staffing up a primetime documentary series for BBC1. I thought she would be
perfect for the gig – she was a strong self-shooter and had just finished
working on an observational series following the lives of a few key characters.
All qualities the primetime series would need.
She happened to be black.
She had an informal chat and a coffee with the series producer. We
all know the type of thing – this is not an interview/interview type of
scenario.
Afterwards I asked her how it went.
Not good – came the response.
She told me the series producer had asked her if she thought she
would have problems filming and forging relationships with white contributors.
The series she had just finished working on was filming the lives of
black people – this new job was more “mainstream” following the lives of predominantly
white people.
I should mention at this point that the assistant producer in
question worked in the BBC an had been born in and lived her entire life in the
UK. White people were not an alien group to her.
She didn’t get the job.
It is impossible to say if it was due to her race that she didn’t
get the job – there are a million and one reasons why people don’t get work in
the highly competitive field of television. However, what was interesting is most
of the final production team were women – from senior producer roles to junior researcher
jobs. In fact the only senior role held by a man was the series producer.
This was over 10 years ago, but in today’s lingo it would be
described as a win for gender diversity – but was it really?
I was reminded of this incident after the publication of a new study
looking at gender diversity in Psychology of Women Quarterly.
First the good news…
Over the course of four experiments the new study found that white
men were not only open to more gender diversity they positively embraced it.
White men thought companies that promoted gender diversity were not
only more forward looking but more prestigious.
Now for the bad news…
After establishing the positive link that white men had between
gender diversity and a companies success the researchers wanted to see what
effect race would have on those perceptions.
In one experiment they took a company brochure that had been viewed favorably
and substituted some of the pictures of white women with African-American
women. The fictional company immediately went down in people’s perception.
In another experiment they attributed statements to a woman with a “white
sounding” name from a company versus statements from a woman with a more
typically “African-American name”, again the perception of the company went
down for the company with the woman with an African American sounding name.
And a third experiment looked at how white men viewed statements attributed
to a white man from a fictional predominantly white male company, versus
statements attributed to a white woman in a more gender mixed but predominantly
white fictional company versus statements attributed to an African-American
woman in a more racially mixed fictional company. The respondents rated the statement
by the white woman the highest, followed by the white man with the African-American
woman coming in last.
This new study is important for a number of reasons.
In recent years there has been the concern that there has been a
pushback against gender diversity generally. According to UCLA
Anderson Management “In consulting firm PwC’s 2019 Annual Corporate Directors Survey, 68% of directors
surveyed felt investors were paying too much attention to gender diversity,
nearly double the percentage of the previous year.” What this study tells us,
is if you want your company to be viewed favorably those 68% of directors are
wrong. We need to pay more attention to gender diversity - not less. There is
still a long way to go in television – where women still make up less than a
third of television directors and every UK broadcaster has a gender pay gap
issue.
However, what the study also tells us is that if we are not careful
it will be white women who will be the beneficiaries of those gender diversity
gains while black women are left behind. Much like my very unscientific
anecdote at the start of this piece.
Championing diversity is essential and we should celebrate all
diversity gains. But it is also important to recognize that not all diversity
gains help all diverse people – even when they might be perceived as being in
the same group.
No comments:
Post a Comment