“It’s not about race, it’s about class.”
I’ve heard variations of this statement at the
last few events I have been to about diversity in the television industry.
Sometimes the idea comes from the audience other times it can come from the
invited guests on the panel or giving a speech.
The idea is that when we talk about the
under-representation of BAME people in front and behind the camera we are
actually confusing race and class together.
The argument normally goes as follows:
It is in fact working class people who are
under-represented in the television industry. For example only 37% of BBC executives went to comprehensive or
secondary modern schools.
Because black people are more likely to be working class (see statistics on black unemployment and the number
of black people in managerial
positions) that is why they are under-represented in the media. The fact
they are black is almost coincidental. Solve class diversity and everything
else will follow.
So do BAME people only reach a certain point in
their careers because they are black or because they didn’t go to private
school? And does this mean BAME middle-class people do not experience racism
and glass ceilings at work?
The leading expert on race and class in Britain
is Dr
Nicola Rollock of the University of Birmingham, she recently wrote a very
interesting paper on this issue called “Race, Class and ‘The
Harmony of Dispositions’”, (it’s only 5 pages long and well worth a read).
In it she points out that class is so much more
than just the money you earn. It is about where you live, your interests, your
tastes and your circle of friends. To use the academic terms class is about
your “financial capital” and your “social capital”. (The BBC also
did an online survey in which you could find out your class based on these factors). Ultimately the life opportunities which
are available to you are usually a result of your social and financial capital.
But here is the interesting part of Dr Rollock’s
work; at each stage race plays a part in how much your social and financial
capital are worth and which doors they are able to open. Her work is littered
with examples of BAME people who would be termed “middle-class” experiencing
racism. Also race also plays a role in which class other people perceive you to
be in and therefore how you are treated. To put it crudely a white man driving
an expensive car might be middle-class but a black man driving the same car
might be thought of as a drug dealer.
So how does this help us when we are trying to
tackle issues of diversity in the television industry?
Firstly it tells us a reductive approach is not
helpful when talking about diversity.There is no doubt class diversity needs to
be tackled but so does ethnic diversity, gender diversity, disability etc.
There may be “overlap” on some of the issues but solving one issue does not
necessarily solve the other.
Second the vast majority of BAME people -
irrespective of their class - will experience racism and glass ceilings in
their careers. Not to acknowledge this can often be insulting to the very BAME
middle-class people are both simultaneously victims of racism while being told
they have “escaped” problems associated with their race.
And finally when the next person tells you that
“it’s not about race, it’s about class” just tell them to read some of the work
of Dr Rollock.
Denying anyone the challenges they face due to
their gender, race, class, sexuality or disability is rarely the best way to
solve their problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment